Cartier-Bresson lets me know

Cartier-Bresson, who is ageless, noted with amusement that I tore off the latest page from my desk calendar and revealed my birthday, making me a paltry sixty-seven.

            “Pablo,” as he persists in calling me, “you are yet a stripling, as your first post to this blog risibly showed.”

            “C-B,” I said wearily, “regardless of whatever your greatness as a photographer may be, you are betrayed by your lack of empathy.”

            “Pablo, Pablo, . . . ,” C-B answered, “you are hardly the first to think you can take photographs and imagine them to be paintings. They are not. A photograph is a photograph, deprived of the painter’s wielding of the brush, the nuanced moment when he—or let’s allow she—may swerve from what is called reality and find a part of the truth distinctly apart from the ho-hum quotidian hard-and-fast facts of life.”

            “Really?” I asked of C-B. “When you frame the decisive moment of a passing scene, aren’t you seeing something more than a fragment of time? And doesn’t that mean you are like the painter who isolates a series of brushstrokes and calls them collectively an image that matters?”

            “Really, Pablo,” C-B answered, “you take these matters far too seriously. You are an OK taker of images, some of which tell us more than what a patch of color or a vague shape may fleetingly convey. You are, however, far from wresting from the constant flow of things a moment we can say is above the flux, an image of key constancy. Believe me, it will continue to be for you like the ever-receding wave on the horizon tantalizingly out of your reach. You are yet a stripling, not a true capturer of the moment when time and chance intersect and provide us with the this that is the exact that.”

            “C-B,” I said, “much as I admire the exactitude of your art, you can be exasperatingly certain that you know better than anyone else what makes a moment freeze from the inexorable passage of time and demand our attention. You are, instead, the luckily perceptive passive eye that after many dozens of takes discovers he has found a gaunt woman garbed partly in an American flag pointing to something outside the frame she is angry about. Truly, lucky you.”

            “No, Pablo, that is not so,” C-B asserted decisively. “I saw that mad woman in one moment as her bony arm pointed to what outraged her so, even though I didn’t know what it was. What mattered to me was the moment of the woman’s ultimate self-exposure.”

            “OK, C-B,” I nodded wearily, knowing full well he was far beyond me as a measurer of moments deserving to be memorialized in photographs.

            “Pablo,” C-B kindly said, “you are as yet a work in progress. That is as it should be. Even if I live to 617 years, my camera still will not have caught a truly decisive moment. Only its approximation.”

           

Painterly Photographs

I aspire to make photographs that evoke the sense of looking at a painting. But I don't really have in mind what Merriam-Webster's defines as painterly photography: "marked by an openness of form which is not linear and in which sharp outlines are lacking." That strikes me as a nebulous way of characterizing a gauzy, indistinct image verging on the amorphous. I see nothing wrong with producing a photo having such qualities, as long as some aspect of it is strongly defined (e.g., the color gradations or how the shapes contrast with or intersect or mirror each other).

For me, though, the painterly aspect of a photograph can emerge to some extent—in some cases, to a large degree—from how sharply an image is delineated, in conjunction with shapeliness of form and nuanced gradation of color. Another factor is the way the background sets off or complements the figure(s) and chromatic character of the foreground. In my view, if the background is sufficiently "painterly" in the Merriam-Webster sense, it serves as a kind of matrix that lifts the foreground into a realm of its own, separate from the usual context of time and space. And in that quasi non-real environment, the elements of line, form, and hue can be more clearly perceived—and aesthetically enjoyed.